Before I get into the debate itself lets answer why the heated debate happened in the first place. To be blunt there has a deep distrust with (ETO) Environmental Task Force Operations with local communities. There have been good reasons floating around for this distrust.
First, they are a spin off of Special Projects Management Operation Clean Bay, which has a very shady past. It was formed by National Park Rangers and staff of the Gateway National Recreation Area to clean up abandoned boats in Jamaica Bay. Needless to say it ended very badly. Whenever the term “pending litigation” has to come into play, you know its going to be bad. Basically the Park Rangers boat captains are all suing each other.
Secondly and mainly, ETO has had an ongoing relationship with Knapp Street and Lacon Ct property developer Stephen Jemal. To be blunt again, What is planned to be built by Jemal at at Lacon Court will destroy Gerritsen Beach, if not cause irreparable harm.
As you may be aware, some in the community as well as GB.net has been keeping close tabs on the Jemal developments. Recently, Jemal was ordered to clean up the docks at Lacon Court by the NYS DEC, if he did not comply he was going to be fined $10,000 a day.
ETO then, seemed to step in last minute and took over conversations with the DEC on behalf of Stephen Jemal. Jemal has not been fined since ETO stepped in.
The ETO-Jemal relationship in a nutshell: in exchange for free rent on Lacon Ct ETO would maintain 4 properties for Jemal and take over corresponding with the DEC. The property maintenance may or may not be a good thing, it depends on how you look at it, they are trimming, leveling soil, more or less cleaning the empty lot. This is all great and wonderful, but it does not help with the perceived distrust.
On to the debate!
Bill Dumphy (Gerritsen Resident, and ETO board member)confronted the GBPOA to “clear up bad reports”.
Mr. Bill Dumphy had again summed up ETO’s role in Gerritsen Beach specifically in the waterways and on Stephen Jemals lot. He stated that they are on his property because they were kicked off their previous location, literally across the creek at the sewer plant DEP, because of allegations made by a former operation clean bay member.
He stated that in the last two months he personally removed 8 boats from the creek, totaling 150 so far removed by their organization. Apparently ETO did this all for free and was expensed out of pocket.
George Broadhead, President GBPOA, is not taking issue with the work ETO does, stating he strongly believes in free enterprise. He argued that ETO stepped in last minute just when the community had them on the ropes.
Bill interjected multiple times and made it a point that ETO sent a letter to DEC urging them to fine Jemal for non compliance. Yelling “Fine the slimeball…wont affect us“. “We aren’t doing Jemal any favors.”
After contacting ETO to see what they thought about the meeting, Greg Moss President of ETO stated that no more than two weeks after GB.nets initial post, their relationship with SSJ development stared to go sour. ETO was trying to secure a contract that gave them permissions to be on the land and to also remove the docks for Jemal. However, SSJ kept pushing back and postponing meetings to secure the contract to the point where ETO felt they might of been used by SSJ to delay the impending $10,000 a day fine. As a result ETO sent a email to the DEC stating that Jemal has no intention of coming into compliance and DEC has to do what it needs to do.
They are currently looking for a new spot to relocate.




Can ETO provide the site with a copy of this letter/e-mail?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
ETO then, seemed to step in last minute and took over conversations with the DEC on behalf of Stephen Jemal. Jemal has not been fined since ETO stepped in.
Ok, let me get this straight. Nothing was done to maintain the property as far as anyone can tell. None of the broken down docks were removed, no boats were removed from the shoreline, nothing was cleaned up and as a result….fines were halted? What a joke.
Further…..let me ask this only because I am totally confused here….the tree removal business/people that currently occupy Lacon Court property are part of this ETO organization or are they a business simply renting out the space for the time being?
If this ETO organization moves on, what will ultimately happen to SSJ? Will DEC resume fines or will he somehow manage to weasle his way out of it?
Like or Dislike:
0
0
Can we get a copy of this “letter” posted on GB.net? Guessing that DEC needs to approve some plan or permit the removal first, can’t just say do it since ETO/SSJ could just end up making it worse. If ETO is out, then that warning letter Jemal got would rachet up to the next step, including the fines it stated.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@,
BILL DUNPHY IS NOT TELLING THE WHOLE STORY,
HE IS BENEFITING BY THIS WHOLE SCANDEL.EVERYONE CONNECTED WITH THE ETO BILL, PERRY AND GREGG ALL BENIFITED THRU RALPH MANNETTA THE NPS RANGER WHO OVERSAW OPERATION CLEAN BAY.THEY ARE ALL IN THE SAME BOAT TOGETHER. I WILL BE ABLE TO STATE FACTS VERY SHORTLY IN A COURT ROOM. DONT BELIEVE A THING THEY SAY.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@CAPT.BERNIE, THIS WILL BE GENE BERARDELLI’S MOST PUBLICIZED CASE, THAT HE WILL LOSE.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@CAPT.BERNIE, ONE LAST COMMENT, BILL DUNPHY PUBLICLY STATED THAT I DID NOTHING FOR THE ETO AND OPERATION CLEAN BAY. I HAVE TAKEN OUT THE PRESS, CHANNEL 12, CHANNEL 11, THE COMMUNITY BOARD PRES, THE CITY DOCKMASTER, D.E.C, LT. LOPEZ,ASSOCIATED PRESS AND MANY OTHERS ON MY VESSEL TO GET POSITIVE PUBLICITY FOR OPERATION CLEAN BAY AND THE ETO. I EXPENDED WAY MORE THAN “$75.00″ PER TRIP OUT OF MY POCKET. BILL DUNPHEY STUFF IT!!!!
Like or Dislike:
0
0
isnt it funny how the eto is trying to distance itself from ralph menneta and stephan jamal just like rats leaving a ship on fire the truth shall prevail
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@policeman, THEY ARE LEAVING THE SHIP LIKE RATS BECAUSE THEY ARE RATS
Like or Dislike:
0
0
your caps lock is stuck.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
@,
So much yelling.
Like or Dislike:
0
0
wheres the letter? eto said it would furnish.
Like or Dislike:
0
0