A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

What Lundy’s is Now! Pre-Meeting Tour


Lundy’s Walkthrough Photo Gallery
Recently I was invited for a tour inside Lundy’s, as a way to straighten out rumors about what is going on inside and what the business planes to become. Putting aside most of the rumors until after the Sheepshead Bay meeting. Here is what I learned from my tour:

Cherry Hill Gourmet Market, which is a High-Quality Gourmet Deli, which will be opening inside the landmark Lundy’s location. They don’t own the building but they are leasing it from the owner.

When you first walk in you immediately notice the quality and amount of the work and your hit by the amount of money that was obviously spent inside. It almost coins the term spared no expense.


The first floor is covered in stone flooring; the columns are wrapped in custom built wood shelving, the walls are lined with stainless steel deli counters with more custom built wood shelving. All of the woodwork was done on site and surprisingly, the ceiling is covered in hundreds of multi-colored wicker baskets.


Where the Clam Bar used to be is now a bakery of sorts, where they will be selling baked goods, pastries, cakes, coffee, and tea.

Where the restaurant seating used to be (the center of Lundy’s) is now a large, open air, circular refrigerator, cash registers and a small eating area.

The ceiling above the small eating area is covered in hand made ceramic flowers, designed as a large tree, this was the most impressive out of all the work.


The mezzanine has a decent mural painted on its all but the whole mezzanine maybe has seating for 25.

On the 2nd Floor will be a Seafood Restaurant and Party Hall. In the past in Lundy’s peak, they would have 20,000 customers a weekend, 2,000 sitting at any time. This new restaurant might be able to seat a max of 300, but that number in my opinion is going to be a stretch.

They still have everything they took down off the building IE: the Awning and Lettering and have since restored or repainted them. They will be putting them back up.


They also Restored or changed over 200 stained-glass windows. Restored and repainted all of the outdoor lamps. They kept all of the original lighting and chandeliers. They also have most if not all of the old original Lundys artwork,photographs, frames that used to surround Lundy’s.

Our tour guide explained that they would “hopefully before the summer but as quickly as two weeks.”

I’m looking forward to tonight’s meeting so I can further explain the politics, behind what is keeping them from opening.


27 comments to What Lundy’s is Now! Pre-Meeting Tour

  • local broker

    Wow some people are ridiculous. that building was garbage and was worth nothing so someone comes along wants to renovate it open a legit business for the neighborhood and people want to slam them every step of the way. where was everyone when the bestwestern went up how come there was no protesting when the sheepshead bay diner turned into condos. they didnt rip the building down they fixed it for the better. this is a joke.

    • SB/PB Civic

      For the record, local broker, the SB/PBCA was responsible for tens of thousands of dollars worth of fines against the Best Western when it was illegally dumping construction waste into catch basins that empty into Sheepshead Bay while building as well as countless other building violations, and the SB/PBCA picketed when Best Western opened and initially allowed “short stays.” Also, the SB/PBCA raised concerns about the two “sub-basements” in the original design plan where the SB Diner now stood, and with DOB’s help, got the developer to change its plans. Not huge victories (no one is going to stop an as-of-right building!), but it’s not we stood idly by either.

      As far as our involvement with Lundy’s, SB/PBCA is not “slamming” anyone, but others in the community have. We only complained about the lettering being removed from the site as a violation of its landmark status. Other than that, we’ve been open to listening to all sides (those being the new sub-tenant in Lundy’s and those that oppose the new sub-tenant’s proposed use) as far as use of the building, (which may or may not be against the special use group created by the Special SHeepshead Bay District) and has taken NO POSITION on the building’s usage until we can hear the “facts”. That’s the point of tonight’s meeting in Lundy’s – to get to the truth.

      Thanks again to Cherry Hill for hosting us and GB.net on that walking tour – you can see it all firsthand at our meeting tonight (3/3) inside Lundy’s at 7:30 PM. Hope to see you there, local broker. Let’s find out together if this is “a joke” or not.

      • local broker

        listen im pro development if its done the right way. i used the other examples as far as the amount of negative publicity thats going into the opening of a deli in an existing building compared to the others i mentioned. i didnt point fingers at who is doing the slamming because i dont know all the people who are doing it. but someone got a politician to make a big deal out of it. all im saying is its a deli they are improving the building stop being so negative towards them. and i have a business meeting so i wont be there dont really think i would have went anyway. i will see it when they open. and if you want to fight a development that is wrong and will hurt this area start looking into the mall that acadia realty trust wants to build on sheepshead bay road. that one does not belong here.

  • local broker

    i just looked at all the photos you took great shots all of them. if the products they sell are as good as it looks i dont see how anyone can complain about what these people have done. and it looks like they tried to keep as much as they could of the old place.

  • monsterzro

    if they’re good, I’ll support them, given I can find parking!

  • BIG Steve

    If the zoning is not followed why have it? You give all the same arguments as Lohmann’s did.
    What if they spend $10 million and give every community group $100,000 each year, is that then ok? I would think not.

    The Landlord is obligated to maintain the building and can be pressurred to do so, and cannot intentionly let a Landmark fall intop disrepair in hope of an exception to that status or a variance! A variance has 5 findings as a minimum that by law, Section 72-21, which MUST be met and they cannot make even one finding.

    The law must apply equally to all, no matter how much they spend. The economy is now a convienent excuse. Where was Tappas and the politics since the last operators went under? Those operators knew very little in operating more than a diner. The place was doomed after Tam left. No one is coming to Lundys or down to the Sheepshead Bay waterfront because of a “Gourmet Market”….they come to be by the Bay, and if a “name” place was there. I am sorry but your reasoning then opens the door for the same rationale in Historic Districts, Special Districts and Landmark buildings anywhere facing hard times…We must work together to find better solutions for our shared long term goals and not always for the quick fix…

    During the Lohmann’s battle people always said it’s been twenty years and we must have something, blah blah, it had only been less than five years and long term goals and planning take time and effort and staying the course persistance. Even now, if the owners really wanted there is Federal, State and private funding for Landmarks if someone only makes the effort.

    • beachwalker

      Could you please explain, for those of us who are new to this debate what you wpould prefer in this building, barring being able to turn back the clock and have it be Lundys in its heyday again. That would be great, but impossible, and it looks like they have done a beautiful job with it.

    • BrooklynBus

      Loemann’s did not destroy Sheepshead Bay as some were claiming it would do. It improved the area. The Gourmet Market and Restaurant will also be an improvement to a vacant eyesore that would have existed until the economy improves, whenever that happens.

      I hope Carl Kruger gets to eat his words: “…the so-called Cherry Hill Gourmet Market…will meet its long-overdue and well-deserved end” when it proves to be a success. More likely, he will be the first one to take credit for it claiming if not for his intervention, the restoration of the exterior never would have taken place. If that comes to pass, no one will be dumb enough to believe it.

  • Nick Lak

    Place looks incredible.

  • BIG Steve

    It’s more than just looks, it’s about the law and understanding zoning regulations and why we have them. It is also about why we have Landmarks for future generations when we are all gone. Your lack of understanding of the illegal Lohmann’s demonstrates to me that you don’t know about that battle and why it hurt the Bay, as well as opened the door setting a legal prescedent for over development across the city. I am in real estate and want development as much as anyone, but I don’t put short sightness and the need for immediate gain over long term planning and vision. Stucco chips that’s normal, and metal rusts which coming drips on any stucco building after a while. It is not a big deal and not that hard to fix.

    Lohmann’s came in, the zoning was broken by over 800%, and within a few years development without any regard to our unique waterfront character errupted. We went from eight bait & Tackle shops and 38 -40 fishing boats, employing over 1,200 people, plus local marine related repair, insurance parts etc jobs, all lost. This is not to mention that the boats without sufficient, close and affordable parking were forced to leave the Bay for Long Island, Jersey, the South east coast scattered all the way to Florida and some in New England. The shopping on the Bay could have been anywhere. People who shop at Lohmann’s would shop there anywhere and don’t look outside the phony windows to shop. And lastly, the rest of the plaza has turned into eateries, which is exactly what we said it would! They are also the only property without the legally required London Plain trees every 15 feet along the barren concrete.

    Strict zoning and enforcement are always looked at as a hassle, but also always result in the higher real estate values and community standards and higher quality of life, where people want most to live; in the long term.

    Finally, I will no debate this here any further, as it is silly and a waste of precious time. I make these comments to try to help and inform you and any others who may read this. But there are many successful large scale restaurants and yes, seafood houses around the country which seat 1,000 to 2,000, much larger than the current main dining area of 425- maybe 450 in the Lundy’s present state. The operators from Dec 1995 to 2005 simply didn’t do a good job. The restaurant business is very difficult with almost a 90% failure rate in the first few years. However, if you know what you are doing as Legal Sefoods and BIG Fish do as quality seafood houses(just to name two) then you know the mix needed of good food and good service. You can’t succeed without both. And so you can know the rest of the story, there was in fact interest by such places in Lundy’s, but the lessor Pappas wouldn’t even return inquiry calls.
    I will end this in saying, that the zoning Senator Kruger speaks of does not allow a market there. That is the bottom line, and NO it is not subject to interpretation as some have suggested, the zoning is very clear, specifically listing what can be there! Sorry, unless you, like all the others, that are falling over themselves because the poor tenant, which I do feel for very much, and I understand the community’s desire to see something there too, that just because he spent alot and it looks nice , the law can be ignored. What if it didn’t look nice? What if he didn’t spend that much? Is that a new measure of when we police our community and enforce the zoning laws? Does that mean those without large sums of money to spend or who build things that some may not Like or pass the “nice looking” test, that they can’t get the same exception to the law? What about the fully legal, zoning allowing similar gourmet markets on Avenue Z, which is where this current operator learned the business from? How are their investments protected for opening where the zoning does allow them? Planning and getting quality tenants in our community are very important and sometimes takes years. This is most important in our unique landmark building Lundy’s. Think about it? Have a nice Spring!

    • local broker

      have you heard of evolution. 15 years ago you had to go to the library now you can search the internet. point is the zoning is outdated. there is nothing wrong with putting a deli market there. did you know that the zoning for most of coney island avenue is for auto repair and sales. how nice would that be if there were no stores just body shops and showrooms for 2 miles. and im sure that if there were alot of illegal structures being put up the city or community would stop it. and laws can be interpreted in different ways its who can make the best argument. dont you watch law and order.

  • BIG Steve

    Last time I checked Law & Order is a TV show! Sheepshead Bay is still a waterfront community and Emmons Avenue, especially along the esplanade is the center of it all with Lundy’s the Landmark show place. If you don’t like the zoning change it. What have you done to help?

    Interpretation is right but ONLY IF the law allows for it. Here the Special Zoning is very clear and very specific. It does not allow markets, groceries, etc in that prime area opposite the esplanade. There is no interpretation in this instance, no matter what some others have tried to spin here. I hope this helps you understand better.

    I have spent the last 25 years working with the Sheepshead Bay Special District zoning, working with City planning on revisions and even litigating on the Special District Zoning; it is for long term waterfront stability and balance in the area and the impact on the rest of Sheepshead Bay’s commercial shopping main streets. There are “gourmet” markets, delis, whatever you want to label it along Avenue Z, only a few blocks north, just to name a few. Why can’t we have both markets where they are zoned and other uses appropriate for the waterfront as the zoning describes. It’s all about balance and long term, much beyond your 15 year example. Zoning isn’t changed on a real estate whim or economic cycle, but for future generations and long term stabilty. That leads to higher standard of living and higher quality of life. Don’t we here in Sheepshead Bay deserve that?

    I am real estate and small business development and dedicated the main street revitalization, so as much as anyone would love to see all of that. However, unlike many, I prefer quality and appropriate uses and scale, even if it takes much longer to obtain, because the long term benefit improves the entire community and values for all. Smart, well thought out “evolutionary” and in the end a higher quality of life. Speaking of evolution, this discussion is nice, but is accomplishing nothing here on a cite for a few. I wish you well whoever you are and invite you to celebrate our community Sunday May 17th at NOON for BayFest -East 27th and Emmons Avenue, in front of the last Bait & Tackle shop, Stella Maris Fishing Station!

    • Resident

      Big Steve what agency would not allow would be interpreting the law? City Planning?

      Didn’t he say that they need a letter from some agency of no objection that would allow him to open?

  • BIG Steve

    POLITICS is in play here….last time I will address this here. IN THIS CASE, there is no room for interpretation under this zoning, as is the law today! I can’t be any clearer than that. Not in this precise scenario. That doesn’t mean interpretation doesn’t play into applications of zoning text, it’s just that there is no room for that in the current Lundy’s situation. The fact that others say it’s subjective, etc, demonstrates their lack of understanding the clear, with out a doubt black and white law here. See ya at BayFest! Sorry, but I can’t spend anymore time on this unfortunate matter.

    • SB/PB Civic

      Sorry to disagree with you, Steve, but one thing we learned during the ULURP process & the Sheepshead Bay Re-Zoning – and this came directly by City Planning – is that zoning rules ARE interpreted. No law, no regulation is ever black and white.

      Otherwise, lawyers would be unnecessary in this world!

  • anon

    Is this going to be a mostly Russian store? I would assume it is. I am not being predudiced, I am just asking.

    • Shamil Benyaminov

      Russian store ……Soviet people majority speak Russian but not necessarily from Russia

  • BIG Steve

    Not in this Special USE District case in this zone B. The law is, as one Board member recently put it, “black and white” and very clear. Sorry, but you don’t need lawyers for everything and too many lawyers have lost their way and the honor of the profession being sue happy and unecessarily litigious. A “Civic” is supposed to be the watchdog of the community, especially our zoning; sadly the civic has dropped the ball again. We at the Bay Improvement Group community coalition will once again have the courage to consistantly stand up and say. “NO” when the law is not followed. Success or the amount of money spent on any project is totally irrelevant. I answered this out of necessity, so that people who read this do not misunderstand your insistance on twisting the clear zoning here. This is nothing against the owner, the operator or anyone group or whatever language is spoken. The LAW as currently existing, must be followed and there is nothing here in this specific issue that can even be subject to interpretation.

    We are done here, the rest is up to you. Oh yea, and your re-zoning only a very small portion of less than eight blocks, instead of a large portion of the Sheepshead Bay as we advocated, like many other communities successfully accomplished, is most regretful and may end up hurting your own neighbors instead of helping the community at large. See ya BayFest Sunday May 17th tell your friends.

    • SB/PB Civic

      Dropped the ball? Hardly.

      In fact, SB/PB Civic has taken the ball and ran far beyond what anyone ever could have.

      No one is “twisting” zoning. As you yourself said at the meeting, (it’s on video!) the zoning laws are interpreted within the context of the Special Sheepshead Bay District. Your words. In fact, first you said it’s “black and white”, then when confronted with the Special District text, you backpedaled into “interpretation”

      So at least we “apparently” agree on that. Now we’re debating on the proper interpretation. And on video, that was also “apparently” in agreement. The intent is there in the zoning text – unique recreational and commercial character.

      In the end, it’s all up to City Planning. The question for the city is if this use is within Use Group SB (94-062) of the Special District. The answer, according to DCP officials we’ve consulted is “maybe.”

      As a final note, your venom is saddening. SB/PB did advocate for re-zoning ALL of Sheepshead Bay. in fact, we were the ONLY civic actively advocating for Sheepshead Bay. We were the foot soldiers out on the street, taking hundreds of photos, organizing walking tours, and meeting with DCP officials to get it done. DCP ultimately sponsored the re-zoning plan, and decided on which blocks after reviewing ALL OF OUR evidence. They decided which blocks, not us. You’re right – it is regrettable that the rest of SB didn’t get re-zoned. But at least we put the work in, and didn’t just talk about it.

  • Resident in SB

    We as concerned citizens and residents of this unique waterfront community should be more informed of the facts. The law is specific and not open to interpretation in The Special District of Sheepshead Bay. The Lundy’s building (outside) which is a landmark must be maintained according to the Landmark Commission. The inside must follow the strict law outlined in Special Purpose District. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/pdf/zone/art09c04.pdf
    94-062 Use Group SB
    Please read the zoning resolution. We must preserve our historic landmarks in our neighborhood and across the city.

  • Bill H.

    I have been in the Bay for 75 years and own property along the Emmons Avenue Special District, Sheepshead Bay Road and other places in the area. I bought my property from the Lundy’s estate in the early 1980’s. I have watched and followed the debates and battles very closely. As a long time real estate investor/owner, I can say I agree with BIG and Steve on this one, as I too, must follow the Special Use District with my properties. I also agree with the resident citing the clear nature of the issue here and how the zoning is crystal clear in this case.

    The unwarranted personal attack by the PBCA civic reply is a pattern that is beneath contempt. Steve was right, accept it. No single person has put himself second, and has done more for making Sheeepshead Bay better and putting the Bay area on the map and raising awareness of our waterfront and zoning issues for all of the community and our city in the last forty years! And his Bay Group, BIG has tackled more issues, put in more hours, accomplished many things and raised community attention, more in just their first few years than all the neighborhood groups combined in the last four decades. The Lundy’s market use is wrong and it should be stopped, if anyone has the courage to do the right thing here. If not, why shouldn’t I rent my spaces to anyone and I am not even in a Landmark?

    Thank you Steve, clearly there are some in the community that don’t appreciate all you have done and sacrificed for Sheepshead Bay. We are blessed to have you anytime. Bill. And before I forget, one of my office workers stumbled across this site, so I won’t play the tit for tat game here, nor will I monitor this. I have asked for no notification here. Thanks for listening. Steve, I may not always agree with you, but most of the time you are right, as you are here!

  • Tired of BIG Steve

    Unwarranted attack? He attacked Plumb Beach Civic, not the other way around! That WAS unwarranted.

    Where is there an attack on Steve? It’s nothing but truth. the Plumb Beach Civic was responsible for the re-zoning push in the area. Steve wasn’t. Did he talk about it? Yes. Did he do anything to further the re-zoning effort? No.

    Let’s not play victim here… it’s embarrassing.

    I watched the video – It’s in the fifth clip. Everyone said it’s up to interpretation!!! Steve said it after the zoning text was read, the attorney from the Civic said it, even Councilman Fidler! This is so ridiculous.

    But if you want an attack, here’s one:

    A “civic” isn’t just a watchdog for the community, it’s an organization that’s supposed to have the best interests of the community first and foremost. Plumb Beach Civic gets it. They’re not saying it’s ideal, but they’ll live with it if the building is improved according to the zoning.

    By stubbornly reading the zoning the way you are, you are pushing for an empty dilapidated landmark instead of a landmark with a chance of having a good business that brings jobs and money into the neighborhood. You’d rather the community have a vacant property in the heart of the commercial area than a business that you think doesn’t fit the way you think it should.

    That’s mighty BIG of you, steve.

    • SB/PB Civic

      There’s no need to attack anyone. Please don’t let this debate degrade into personal attacks. “Tired of BIG Steve”: Steve has indeed done a lot for Sheepshead Bay, and while we disagree on the finer points of zoning in the issue at hand, I will not stoop to a level that degrades what he has done in the community simply because we are pursuing different opinions. Debates do not mean there should be animosity.

      I apologize to all who thought I was attacking anyone. It was definitely not my intent. I was expressing my disappointment in a response that appeared to denigrate our Association’s accomplishments, and had nothing to do with the issue at hand.

  • Bill H.

    You missed the point, but what else can I expect from either laymen or non land use lawyer talk. The “interpretation” is for those laymen and non land use attorneys regarding the Special District zoning, not as some sort of subjective academic school debate or on grey areas of zoning text, but these specific itemized USES here, which I have to live by on my own properties in the same Special District. Fidler didn’t quite agree, only in general theory.

    As far as your comment on a vacant building and jobs, you sound like the Loehmann’s developer. Lundy’s and Sheepshead Bay deserve better and if patience and proper use take longer, so be it. That’s the difference between charming lovely places we all love to visit, and “something is better than nothing” thinking; is you end up with exactly what you have now, a hodge podge of mixed unplanned, uncoordinated and non water enhancing uses.

    As far as Steve from BIG, I heard him advocate for tighter zoning, down zoning since the early 1980’s to the present. I heard Fidler say a few times in public meeetings, a number of years ago, that he first even learned of the phrase “down zoning” from Steve Barrison. The rezoning was taken up by your group, the local civic, with many of your board of directors on BIG too, thus that is the “civic’s” role in a community. Once Lohemann’s broke the Special District, and the rush to development after, there wasn’t much neighborhood or character left. Steve put in 25 years, sacrificing his professional and personal life, once the “re-zoning” was set, which was not revealed until that infamous Mayor and CPC visit, it was too late. Steve and I spoke about this, he was not and never was in competition, and thought the down zoning was going to cover all of Sheepshead Bay, just like in Bay Ridge, Bensonhurst and many other communities, as did I as a major property owner here! It was too late then, we thought the local civic had it covered. Oh well.

    So what does all this mean? You said, the best interest of the community was your civic duty! Well, that means the long term vision, not your knee jerk reaction to fill an empty building, but this is our only Landmark in a key location and yes for the long term we deserve better, and yes, it is worth fighting and waiting for. Our society’s need for short term gain, instant reward and gratification is what got us the mess we have along our beautiful harbor Sheepshead Bay. Being BIG and brave is seeing the long term view. BIG is putting up with unwarranted comments for a guy that has put his heart and soul in to this community and NYC and NYS. BIG has advocated since it’s inception for that long term vision and comprehensive well thought out solutions. It’s up to the civic community to decide to act and how. I haven’t seen Steve in a while, but would like to thank him for his hard work every day since I met him in 1983. Thanks BIG Steve, you deserve it and don’t worry about those uninformed, especially the Tired of BIG Steve person. We are lucky to have people like you BIG Steve in the community and many fellow business owners and property owners like myself thank you for putting Sheepshead Bay on the map. I will try to come up to NY for BayFest in May.

  • Simon Belsky, Brooklyn, NY

    Lundy Bros. Restaurant/Cherry Hill Gourmet are Vital to the Community
    What’s so terrible about the revival of a quality seafood restaurant (Lundy Bros.) and the addition of a gourmet market which allows its quality offerings such as deli, cooked/cold foods bakery items and gelato, to be enjoyed in a café atmosphere as well as taken home for dinner? What is so terrible about having organic foods and a quality bakery where none exist?
    What is wrong with trying to resurrect an area in Sheepshead Bay which has been deteriorating for the past 30 plus years?
    Ever since the demise of the famous Lundy Bros. restaurant in 1977, the Landmark Building has been vacant for the last 32 years except for two (2) short term failed attempts to open a seafood restaurant on a much smaller scale. It is clear that just a restaurant in this massive building cannot survive as the clientele that filled Lundy Bros. no longer exists.
    In 1973 with all of the best intentions for the community Sheepshead Bay was designated as a “special district” to promote and strengthen the unique character of the area as a prime location for waterfront and recreational development and to help attract a useful cluster of shops, restaurants and related activities, which will complement and enhance the area.
    Unfortunately, whether it was due to the changing makeup of our diverse community or the changes in the economy it appears that the “special district” zoning in some instances have been more of a hindrance than a help to revitalizing a community.
    Vacant lots and vacant buildings only led to an abundance of garbage, rodent infestation and crime further deteriorating the community.
    A July 9th, 1995 article in The New York Times it states, it was clear to Mr. John E. Nikas, Community Board 15 Chairman and Mr. Mitchell Corby, Director of the City Planning Department’s Brooklyn Office that “We’ve just got to accept that the district’s goals were never realized.”
    Why can’t the few complaining pundits wake up to the reality of history and the existing situation and help Cherry Hill resolve the zoning issue?
    Recently my wife and I spent two (2) hours with Mr. David Isaev, President of Cherry Hill Gourmet discussing his plans and objectives in detail regarding the new Lundy Bros. Restaurant and Cherry Hill Gourmet. I have come away with an understanding as follows:
    • The exterior of the building will be completely restored to conform to the Landmark Preservation requirements.
    • The original Lundy Bros. lettering and awnings will also be restored to its original condition even though the lettering is not part of the façade and not a requirement of Landmark Preservation.
    • The restaurant part of the business will be promoted and marketed to make every effort to revitalize the Lundy Bros. name and restaurant stature.
    • The restaurant will be opened approximately 4-5 months later, due to construction timetable.
    • Baskets in the gourmet area will only be allowed to exit the rear of the building into the parking lot. No baskets will be allowed on Emmons or Ocean Avenues.
    Mr. Isaev has invested an enormous amount of money rebuilding a structure in shambles with the hope of building a successful business and revitalizing an area which is in desperate need of help. The work he has done in the parking lot appears to be a bigger investment that most businesses in the area have made.
    Almost everyone I have spoken to that has seen the interior and had a preview of the plans are extremely positive and are eagerly awaiting the Grand Opening of the Cherry Hill Gourmet and Lundy’s New 4* Restaurant.
    The battle needs to end for the benefit of the community. The issues regarding Landmark Preservation appear to be resolved. With Loehmann’s and condos already on Emmons Avenue, I believe, the zoning has changed dramatically from its original intent. It is time to sit down and together move forward with a solution instead of pointing fingers for politics or personal desires.
    The community should also immediately address possible solutions for additional parking areas and a multitude of promotions to bolster the viability of our fishing/cruising fleet.

  • Anonymous

    What ever happened to all the Sheepshead Bay pictures that were on the walls

    They had 2 of my Grandfather Fred Wrege owner of the effort and the M.J.R,?